●Discussion Guru Elizabeth Lind
Institutions thank the government for its trust when competency requirements for nursing education are removed. But what about those who will now work to close competency gaps?
This text is a discussion post. The content of the text expresses the author's own opinion.
“We thank you for your trust “From Secretary of State Eudmund Höell – we will train competent nurses,” Jürel Ursin, Ingerd Gahr Kimmery, and Marianne Hoan at Nord University recently wrote at a conference. Proceedings in Aviza Nordland. Nord University was one of four institutions that asked the minister in January to remove degree requirements for teaching and nursing education.
Admission and career
It gets the most criticism for removing degree requirements
Now they've got it As they wanted. Forskerforbundet believes that grade requirements in nursing education should be maintained. It provides a better starting point for ensuring quality in education.
But most importantly, those who will train future nurses receive framework conditions that relate to their mission.
If the degree requirement is removedThe framework conditions for nursing education must also change. It is not appropriate to lower the quality requirements for nursing education. Even if the degree requirement is removed, institutions will still have the same responsibility for ensuring students graduate with the right skills. More applicants who do not meet current proficiency requirements indicate an increased need for close and differentiated monitoring of students.
Neither the deans of Nord University, nor the deans of the alliance who wanted to remove degree requirements, came forward with a single demand in return for Odmund Hoyle.
Guru Elizabeth Lind
that's it Of course it is possible. But neither the deans of Nord University, nor the rectors of the universities in the coalition who wanted to remove the degree requirement, put forward a single demand in return for Odmund Hoyle. When Hoyle was asked whether all future nursing students would have the necessary knowledge, among other things, to calculate safe medications, his answer was that he had “full confidence” in the institutions. But he There are no resources that come with this trust.
In other words: the government needs extra effort. The institutions thank you for your trust. Overtime is left to the employees.
The back of the medal
He describes the reform as a “failure”: – This is what the government was supposed to address
I understand that Institutions with vocational education are happy to have more students in classes, and there are societal arguments for doing something about admissions to vocational education. But I would like to remind you that an academic employee works 46 hours a week on average and really struggles to find time to follow up with students in a good way. Meanwhile, cuts and downsizing are everyday economic life in many enterprises.
If the government wants For vocational education reform to be successful, it must also consider the framework conditions for education. If organizations take the work situation of their employees seriously, I would expect more than just a “thank you” for a reform that includes many new demands and no new resources.
●Discussion The four principles of a profit alliance
We train competent candidates regardless of special requirements
“Explorer. Unapologetic entrepreneur. Alcohol fanatic. Certified writer. Wannabe tv evangelist. Twitter fanatic. Student. Web scholar. Travel buff.”
